User:Picklequeen1!/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Wikipedia:WikiProject Photography/History of Photography - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose the history of photography because it seemed like a topic that would appeal to my interests as I do enjoy photography. The article goes through the things that photographers should know criteria wise, and what it means to be a notable and non-notable photographer.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article does give a simple image that has to do with a person mentioned in the article, but there are no more pictures that help give any context to the main body of the article. The article is also not two sided it is very one sided. They discuss what it takes to become a notable photographer, but it is mostly opinion based not backed by proven facts. Yes they include citing and give context, but there could be much more information included. The article is a little hard to understand as someone who doesn't know much about photography, this would not be a very helpful article.