User:Pictile/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Bob Spear (naturalist))

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am interested in prominent naturalists, specifically ones that have a focus or relation to birds in some fashion. Bob Spear is a naturalist I've never heard of that fits the criteria so I chose him.

Evaluate the article
The Article starts with a good description of who the article is about, and it still is quite concise. The Articles content is very relevant to the topic of Bob Spear, it has a brief history with accomplishments and achievements. It does lack some citations, but most of the citations are linked to other Wikipedia pages. I do feel as if there are some un-needed citations done, but nonetheless it doesn't take away from the article. The article as a whole is very clear and concise, it says what it needs to without going on and on. The article doesn't have any images which does take away from the quality and experience as a whole. There is no discussion in the talk page, but it is apart of Wikiproject-birds. It is rated a "start" which I am not too sure what that means. I believe the biggest improvement to the article could be to add images.