User:Piesu123/Lake Nasser/Tson21 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead of the article depicts the importance and relevance of Lake Nasser well. After reviewing the rest of the article it is safe to say the lead does a well job in introducing the topic of Lake Nasser and providing enough introductory details in which the rest of the article is capable of building off of, referencing the important issues and credential of Lake Nasser to the reader that will be built upon throughout the remainder of the article. Within the sandboxed article, the author has provided the they will be implementing changes to information to better elaborate upon what has already been written in the lead. This is a great idea!

The article appears to build off the information provided within the lead. Creating an article with proper flow and a linear stages of development, focusing on addressing the topic, its founding, history, and addressing the values and impact Lake Nasser has within Egypt.

The article appear to cover aspect of Lake Nasser evenly across the article. mentioning Lake Nasser's origins, and importance to Egyptian society. This being said, The article does fixates predominately on more modern information in relation to Lake Nasser, granted the lake was formed from the effects of the Aswan Dam, any insight into the bodies of waters that related in the eventual creation of the lake cold be a lovely idea to provide a more historic insight to the topic in regards to Egyptian history. The article does brush on the subject of its pre-dam founding's, wondering if their is more information that could be said about this aspect of Lake Nasser?

Both the content in which the paper references and the point of view the paper is written in avoid any attributes of biases or intention. Ultimately the paper provides a neutral take on information pertaining to Lake Nassar while also providing non-biased and necessary information that should not impact the readers views. Content referenced within the article appear to stem from reliable sources, and are properly sourced in accordance to Wikipedia requirements. The paper is on the right tracks, cannot wait to see the final article once the author is finished.