User:Pikelake6/Andragogy/Cgpoppert Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Pikelake6


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pikelake6/Andragogy?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Andragogy

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
 * 2) The article does a great job of defining the term Andragogy and providing a history on the term. I was impressed by the critique. I did not know the controversy surrounding Andragogy so I learned quite a bit from this article.
 * 3) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * 4) There are a few grammatical errors that I would suggest the author change and proofread. This change would be an improvement because it would make the article more scholarly.
 * 5) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 6) I think that by adding a section about Andragogy today would be helpful to see the significance and relevance today. I would also add the principles from the original article because those principles helped me understand the nuances of Andragogy better.
 * 7) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!
 * 8) I think that I could add a section about Andragogy to my article about Digital Media Education. I think it's important to talk about adult education on the internet and the implications for adults.