User:Pin Chun Chen/Genome mining/Chunshengyan Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Pin Chun Chen


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Pin Chun Chen/Genome mining


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * ·        The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic.
 * ·        The lead only covers a definition of the topic but not a brief description of the article’s major sections.
 * ·        The lead is concise.

Content:


 * ·        The content added is relevant to the topic and up to date.
 * ·        The application section needs more detailed information, several specific examples will make the section more complete.
 * ·        The content is organized well into different sections.

Source and References:


 * ·        The information provided is from reliable secondary source of information.
 * ·        The content accurately reflects what the cited source says, I checked the 3rd source for the application of natural product discovery.
 * ·        The sources mostly are curt except the sources for the history part.
 * ·        I would suggest looking for more sources about the specific examples for the application.
 * ·        The links all works.

Organization:


 * ·        The content is well written and concise.
 * ·        The last section looks unorganized.

Images and Media:

·        Need to add some images to help explain the topic. Such as the user interface of the genome mining program.

This article is new:


 * ·        The article meets Wikipedia’s Notability requirements.
 * ·        More available literature is not used by this article. However, the sources used concisely describe the topic.
 * ·        The article links to other articles.