User:Pinkdiamond2023$/Homeostatic plasticity/PidgeonTrainer Peer Review

General info
Pinkdiamond2023$
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pinkdiamond2023$/Homeostatic_plasticity/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pinkdiamond2023$/Homeostatic_plasticity?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Homeostatic plasticity

Lead
This section is not currently relevant because the group has not drafted a lead yet.

Content
There is no real content yet, but the group has made an outline. The outline is great, and I think the topics brought up by the group are good ideas to cover. I especially like their idea of examining homeostatic plasticity in neurological disorders. Homeostatic plasticity was a great choice to cover because the original article has very little content on it. I think this group could greatly contribute to it.

Tone and Balance
There is not enough content to get a good idea of the tone of the writing. However, there does not seem to be a bias informing what topics the group chose, and I have no reason to believe that they would not be balanced when writing their additions to the article.

Sources and References
I tried copying and pasting the DOIs of every source in the group's bibliography. The first one linked to an article about quantum computing rather than homeostatic plasticity. The rest of the links worked perfectly, and the articles the group cited were reliable and current. Notably, they all seemed to be review articles rather than primary articles, so the group did a great job picking them. I appreciate how they briefly gave context for the articles after their citations. They have plenty of sources, and they only thing they have left to do with their sources is to see where to incorporate them.

Organization
The outline is well-organized, and the group seems to have an excellent grasp on what they want to write about. The words have a few spelling errors, but that is very easy to fix.

Images and Media
There are no new images or media in the sandbox.

Overall Impressions
I really like where the group is going with their article. As I said, they chose a great article to add to because it seems incomplete. The group has a well-organized outline of what they want to add, and they have a bibliography full of good and reliable sources.