User:Pinkfrog22/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Statistical hypothesis testing

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I have practical experience within the area. Overall, this article is good but not great. The majority of information is correct, but it is somewhat difficult to understand with the extensive use of jargon. The sections that require the most editing of this page are the leading section and the discussion of the test procedures and results.

Evaluate the article
Content: Everything present in the article is relevant to the topic. The examples given are extremely valuable to understanding the article and providing meaning. The definition section is also well done. I see no major content gaps in this article. Despite this, the use of extremely technical language is somewhat detrimental to the lead section and can be misleading for readers. I would suggest that the lead section be revised to use more common language for basic article interpretation.

Tone: This article is neutral in tone. Criticisms are accurately reported in a non biased manner.

Citations/Talk Page: While the citations list is quite extensive, there are a few problems with them as referenced in the Talk Page. One of the most significant problems in this article is misrepresenting citations. It appears that citations have been added that do not actually contain the information referenced. It is good that this has been brought up in the talk page, however it is almost impossible to tell how extensive this problem is. The citations are also well rounded and span from the inception of null hypothesis testing to modern research.