User:Pinknebulla21/SandOner/GreenPanda55 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(I am reviewing Pinknebulla21's article)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://chicanaart.blogspot.com/search/label/2021FHigueraMara


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pinknebulla21/SandOner?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead - In regards to the previous draft, there has been updated changes to the current article draft. The introduction is straightforward and precise, it discusses the artist's background. The draft also highlights the article's main sections in terms of dividing each topic to it's separate section. Additionally, the writer notes important information.

Content - The article discusses the artist's early background with historical information and uses footnotes. However, what is missing is the artist's 'External Links.' Overall, looks good!

Tone and Balance - The tone sounds neutral as well as unbiased.

Sources and References - The sources are cited and footnoted. They seem to be reliable and great sources. Not only that but they are relevant to the article's main points.

Organization - The layout of the draft is a bit misplaced as the introduction is not under 'Lead', and the artist background and education is not under 'Article Body', and the references are in the correct location! Other than that, the article has a nice flow and is precise. I did not see any grammar errors on my end, it looks good!

Images and Media - There are no images of the work but describes her the artist's art practice perfectly.

The article currently has three great reliable sources that speaks on the subject and topic. The article has significantly improved since the last draft and has been updated. The writer added more to the early life and education of the selected artist. Some of the strengths is the tone is precise, neutral, and remains unbiased. Also, the article has a nice structural flow and does not overlap. The writer includes footnotes and references with citable sources as well. What can be improved is just adding 'External Links,' but overall it is a great article. Awesome job!