User:Pinkstethoscope/Quality of life (healthcare)/Kwallabear Peer Review

Ethics and Importance Edits
Importance: I love how detailed you were with your explanation. Including the specific details from clinical research is really helpful. You also mention the phrase "quality of life" a lot, which fits in really well with the content of the article.

Ethics: You bring a nuanced insight to the section. You discuss the advantages and disadvantages well, and you do a good job at informing people on why it can be difficult to assess quality of life domains using single metrics. One thing I'd change is to break up your sentences to make them a little easier to understand. Kwallabear (talk) 18:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)