User:Pitandpendulum/Atlantic surf clam/Cjlewis1204 Peer Review

General info
Pitandpendulum
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Pitandpendulum/Atlantic surf clam
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Atlantic surf clam

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: You're lead seems concise and to the point hitting all the information required for the lead.

Content: The content added to the article is important and relevant to the topic. Some of your sources might seem considered out of date as there might be new information since 1968. I too have some out of date articles and will be trying to find more recent information so that is something you might want to consider. I would consider adding pictures of alive clams to the article.

Tone and Balance: Overall, the information is unbiased and neutral. I would say that there might be room for adding information to the habitat section, maybe describing it and talking more about it.

Sources and references: The sources used look really good! They contain relevant information that was used in your article. As I said, you might want to find other sources that are more relevant. I looked at a couple sources and I feel there is more information that can be used from them to make your article more flushed out.

Organization: It is organized and easy to read!

Overall impressions: The content added definitely improved the article. Due to how short the original article is, I feel as though there might be more information that can be added. As I said more information on the habitat could be added. I would also consider adding other sections, including information on how the clams are farmed. My biggest advice would be to keep digging. Any information on the clam that is relevant should be added. Think of this wikipedia page as a collection of everything you could know about the clam. Looking at articles about other species of clam might be helpful for knowing what info should be found on the page.