User:Pjaml/Biogeochemistry/LandonA77 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
Nothing has been added to the lead section. The section itself seems good and contains relevant details on what biogeochemistry is. The lead does not specify any of the other content sections present in the body of the article, so I would look to briefly mention them. The lead talks about various chemical cycles that aren't mentioned anywhere else, however, these cycles should not have there own sections, because they have their own Wikipedia articles instead.

Content
The content is relevant to the topic and doesn't include anything unnecessary that should be discussed in it's own Wikipedia article. Within the sandbox, Early Development has been added as a subheading and the previous history content now falls under a subheading titled 20th and 21st centuries. I think this is a great change, because it is now in chronological order. Early Development has new information pertaining to the Greeks.

Tone and Balance
The article has a neutral tone and the sandbox changes have this as well.

Sources and References
All sources look valid and are cited properly.

Organization
The content is easy to read and understand. There is a chronological organization to the sections (it flows well).

Images
There are two images that are visually appealing and are captioned well. The images are of public domain.

Overall Impressions
I think the content of this article is really good, adding anything else would probably become too specific, which then shouldn't be included. I thought the change to the history section was really good and flowed really well too. As with anything, I would go through and make sure everything is as concise as possible, even though I didn't notice anything myself.