User:Pjb202/Chimila language/Lexieb619 Peer Review

The lead sentence has been updated to reflect the new content of this article; the sentence concisely describes this articles topic. However, the lead does not give a preview of the article’s other sections. It is concise, with a proper number of details. The newly added content is relative to the topic of the Chimila language. The content is up to date, with references being as recent as 2005 and 2015. All of the content belongs, but there should be a clearer explanation of how and why the names of local rivers and departments are connected to the Chimila language. The newly added content is neutral and shows no bias. The first and second links did not work for me, but the third one did. There likely needs to be more sources reflecting a variety of authors. Overall, the content is concise, clear, and easy to read. Though not complete, I believe the article has it's strengths and insightful information. Lexieb619 (talk) 20:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC) Lexie Busby