User:Pkilkenny1998/sandbox

ARTICLE EVALUATION

The article I looked over was "The Fall of the Western Roman Empire." Overall I think the article was of high quality, it seemed to be very focused and didn't seem to have any apparent bias on the subject. There were only two instances in the article where I felt that more citation was needed, but I can attribute this to having information from the same source. That was only a minor issue, with such a large amount of information that can be verified it makes sense to have about a paragraph coming from the same source, more would be not needed. But there overall was a variety of sources for the article, especially given the amount of information present. I also feel that the article was comprehensive but not overwhelming which is perfect for this kind of article. With all of these elements combined I feel that the article was trustworthy and of high quality information.

ARTICLE CONTRIBUTION

I contributed to the page on "Carnival" the cruise line. Source [90]. "In the Algarve region, several resort towns offer Carnival parades. Besides the themed floats and cars, the festivities include "samba" groups, bands, dances, and music.[90]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carnival&oldid=812146369

I found this source using citation hunt as the instructions put forth.

" The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement. "