User:Plantbella/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Marie Bonaparte

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have a basic knowledge of Marie Bonaparte's sexual research. She's important because she was one of the original feminist sexual scholars.

Evaluate the article
Lead


 * I feel like Marie Bonaparte's relationship to Napoleon Bonaparte should be addressed within the first sentence, and her description of being "closely linked" to Sigmund Freud is a little vague and could be moved down.
 * Description of major sections isn't there, but there is a table of contents.
 * Includes only info. from the article.
 * It is a little overly detailed.

Content


 * Content is relevant to the topic
 * Could be updated with the relevance of her sexual research in a present context
 * Content does tackle historic women in STEM! So yay.

Tone


 * Well balanced
 * Not a lot of room for controversy or conflicting views in this topic, it's simply factual

Sources


 * Diverse range of sources, male and female authors, books, webpages, images


 * Current sources
 * Everything is cited
 * Sources could be looked at more closely for more information (for example, I have read Bonk, and it includes much more context and nuance about Marie Bonaparte than is mentioned in this article
 * Links work

Organization


 * Clear, well organized, no glaring grammatical errors

Images


 * Relevant, add to the article
 * Adhere to copyright guidelines
 * Captioned well -- captions provide good image descriptions

Talk Page


 * Fact-checking and asking for advice on sourcing
 * B-class low importance
 * Editors share opinions in talk page, but remain civil

Overall


 * Basically complete
 * Strong in that it has a good number of sources
 * Could contain more about sexual research and its outcomes
 * Well developed