User:Plantexpert3000/Boerhavia coccinea/Grognak3 Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Plant expert 3000
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Plantexpert3000/Boerhavia coccinea
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Boerhavia coccinea

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: It is concise, and updated.

Content: adds to known sections and gives invasivness its own section, which was needed because it looked too blocky before.

The plant tends to live near large bodies of water, no matter where in the world: I would change "no matter where in the world" to ""globally"B. coccinea is found competing with important crops in Sonora.", I would change "is found competing" to "has also been found to compete"

Tone: There is a lot of implication that invasivness is a bad or troublesome thing. It should not be considered a bad thing for the sake of neutrality.

Sources: there is a lot to fix, specifically their organization. Other than that they look professional.

Organization: sources

Impression: good overall impression, all claims cited. At least a 95% score guaranteed if you fix your neutrality.