User:Plantexpert3000/Evaluate an Article

Article being evaluated: Boerhavia coccinea

Lead section: The lead section starts off strong with a concise description of the plant but is not clearly labeled within the article. Also, it does not outline what information will be included in the article.

Content: The little amount of information that the article contains is well written and effective. The body of the article needs more labeled and separated sections with more detailed paragraphs.

Tone and Balance: The article is not written with apparent bias. The article is easy to read.

Sources and References: There are no cited sources in the first half of the article. This is a big issue. Also, neither of the two cited sources are high quality.

Organization and Writing Quality: The article is well written. The information is not organized into clear sections.

Media and Images: There are two good up close and captioned images, but an image of the entire plant should be added.

Talk Page: There is no communication on the talk page. The article is stub-class and is mid-importance to WikiProject: Plants.

Overall: What this article contains now is fairly well done, other than its lack on references. I want to focus on adding citations to the first half of the article, separating the article into a few distinct sections, and adding some images that show the whole plant.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)