User:Plantl0v3r/Gender pay gap/Ansan500 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Plantlov3r


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Plantl0v3r/Gender_pay_gap?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gender pay gap
 * Gender pay gap

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: I do not believe that the author made any additions to the lead of the article yet, but I am sure that they either plan on working on it in the future or the article includes a comprehensive lead as it currently exists.

Content: The content added by the author in the sandbox draft includes additions to the historical perspectives, reasons for the gender wage gap, consequences, and policy changes sections of the original article. I thought that the additions added relevant details to the article that provided a more complete picture of the gender wage gap. In particular, I thought that the addition of the Motherhood Penalty as a replacement to the title of "Motherhood" added an important academic and economic term to the article that distributes the knowledge we learn in WGSS courses.

Tone and Balance: The tone and balance of the author's additions are in line with the expectations from the Wikipedia models that we have been completing since the beginning of the semester.

Sources: I thought that the sources were appropriate, relevant, and proper in terms of academic journals. One thing that I was unsure of is whether we could directly quote given the copyright issues we learned about in previous models. I am not sure if we are supposed to quote or not.

Organization: The author includes the relevant headings from the article in their sandbox draft in order to supplement each topic with their own sources and facts.