User:PlatOccidentalis/Urban wildlife/Resident Snake Wrangler Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

PlatOccidentalis


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PlatOccidentalis/Urban_wildlife?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Urban wildlife

Evaluate the drafted changes
It does not appear that the lead has been edited, rather, they have drafted an entire new section of the article, titled 'Human Wildlife Conflict'.

I think the addition of your new section is beneficial to the original article, it explores a new context that was previously not thought of or simply overlooked.

Your new section seems to have a neutral stance, and is purely informative of the dynamics surrounding wildlife in cities. Great, allowing the reader to make their own inferences.

Good, peer reviewed sources.

For organization, I think the benefits and costs of interactions should go together right next to one another, and then focus in on management as a whole after you cover both cost and benefit. The flow of an article is subjective though, but that is my thought.

I like the addition of the coyote in town photo that was taken. Any further media additions couldn't hurt.

Overall, I think the addition of your section and subsections with greatly contribute to the main article. It may be beneficial to add hyperlinks to other articles wherever you can as as to increase the connectivity of your article to others. You might be able to do this using general terminology that has its own wiki page. The addition of a "see also" subsection could be interesting, where you could hyperlink fields of ecology or biology that may be closely related to Urban Wildlife.

Good job.