User:Plloren/Bimodal bilingualism/1mychalia1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bimodal Bilingualism


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Plloren/Bimodal bilingualism


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bimodal bilingualism

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * Great job editing a faulty link
 * It's a good idea to add the fact that there are hundreds of sign languages. It removes any bias in terms of dominant sign languages and is far more inclusive.

Article Body


 * The added paragraph (1st paragraph) is well written and I think a great addition
 * I would also reformat the section so it isn't one long paragraph. It would be easier to read and since it is heavy on the science the reformatting will help readers take in the information
 * I believe the adjustments to language use in regards to Deaf people are great! Since the bimodal aspect here heavily refers to sign languages a negativity towards Deaf individuals would turn away a target audience/subject
 * I agree with the third point. Maybe discuss the social perspective of choosing not to speak when Deaf.
 * I agree further research/sources needs to be provided. The fact that the main source for the article is from a linguist in the 90s could attribute to some of the misinformation and negative opinions.
 * adding important vocab is a great choice. it's important to have the right key words when learning a new subject
 * updating the "sign-print" section is a good idea. I think your suggested updates will provided a more content specific explanation

Overall


 * I think all the suggested adjustments are great!
 * You reference bimodal bilingual education - maybe you can add a section about this?