User:Plutocash55/Sharecroppers' Union/Surferr03 Peer Review


 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Plutocash55


 * Link to draft you're reviewing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Plutocash55/Sharecroppers%27_Union?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article's lead very effectively describes the article's topic and what the Sharecroppers union was.

All information included in the lead is elaborated upon in the body of the draft. The content is relevant and up-to-date, and no information appears missing from the draft. The only thing I would do is more clearly divide the content into different paragraphs, just so that the reader does not confuse himself while reading. Also, it would be good if you could divide the "history of the sharecroppers union" into sub-headlines, such as "formation", "problems", and "consequences". The content is also neutral in tone.

The sources cited are reliable and comprehensive, and no better sources were found during the research process. But I would cite them during the reading, and not just in the references at the end. The content is organized, concise, and well-written (I would just make some grammar checks, with commas and stuff). If you could also add images, that would be really good! Overall, this article provides very good information on the topic.