User:Poisonpearl/Forensic toxicology/ToxicologyIsEpic Peer Review

General info
Poisonpearl
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Forensic toxicology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):n/a

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Yes, the lead has been updated and is currently newly displaying content added by user:Poisonpearl.The intro sentence to the draft honestly could not be more concise in terms of describing the field of forensic toxicology and making quite clear the main points of the following described article. The lead includes a brief description of the article, yes and is not overly complicated/complex to read through.

I would suggest that you apply more detail to the drug specific portion of the article. The section article section closer to the middle where it delves into specific drug use could always be elaborated on, and have other drugs and their effects/viewpoint from a forensic toxicologist added. The sections are alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine, probably 3 of the most well known drugs, but fail to specify on cases where other common drugs would be in play, and the resulting effect on the toxicologist's job who were investigating a limited source of information.

Additionally, I would elaborate on the sections pertaining to the bodily fluids a forensic toxicologist may be presented by case-wise. There are more than just urine, blood, hair, and bone marrow for bodily attributes that may additionally be touched on!

The sectioning of this article was done very well, I intend to utilize a similar style to this article's organization to my own. This article had prevented jumping around between sections I'd found when I was reading, so you and the original editor made it quite clear/concise of the article general flow of information presented.