User:Pokerplayer513

Hello fellow Wikipedians. My interests include politics, history, philosophy, and reverting edits done purely for ideological reasons by single purpose accounts.

Articles I Find Interesting

 * Aesopian language
 * Horror vs Terror
 * Propaganda model
 * Shibboleth
 * Use–mention distinction

Personal Opinions on Editing Wikipedia

 * An encyclopedia is poor source of info regarding a controversial topic. Having opposing sides presented while being conscious of WP:DUE is more ideal, actually it's dialectic
 * If a particular philosophy sounds ridiculous, especially in the lead, then it probably has POV problems that stem from the page being edited by it's philosophical opponents
 * Citing sources and/or wikipedia policies during discussions is essential.
 * Just say no
 * 500 edits seems like a lot

Articles I've Created

 * 2019 NCAA Division I Wrestling Championships
 * AJ Agazarm
 * Dillon Danis (helped)
 * Matuse
 * The Lobby (TV series)

Projects

 * Operation Paper

Things To Remember

 * Illegitimi non carborundum


 * Tertiary-source fallacy
 * A. The tertiary-source fallacy (TSF) is the idea that because something appears in a dictionary, encyclopedia, style guide, or other tertiary source that it must be correct (or, especially, that it is the only correct version or interpretation), and that it trumps other arguments and evidence.
 * B. Related


 * Dictionaries as sources


 * DONTUSETERTIARY