User:PolicyPro/sandbox

Regarding the TU-22M article, the paragraph, "As built the Tu-22M included the provision for a retractable probe in the upper part of the nose for aerial refueling. The probe was reportedly removed as a result of the SALT negotiations.[16] The probe can be reinstated if needed.[4][17]" is dated and a bit misleading.

I suggest the following: replacement after the 1st sentence

"In its 31 July 1991 Declaration concerning the TU-22M bomber that accompanied the START I treaty, the then Soviet Union declared that, '(t)he Tu-22M airplane is a medium bomber and is not a strategic offensive arm'. In the Declaration, the Soviets also made a political commitment not to 'give the Tu-22M airplane the capability of operating at intercontinental distances in any manner, including by in-flight refueling'. This political commitment appears to have been adhere to."