User:Polstamin/Social media in the 2020 United States presidential election/Jshpiz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Polstamin, annafilippovaa, GuugWiki, Nikkig1221


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Polstamin/Social_media_in_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election/Jshpiz_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Social media in the 2020 United States presidential election

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There was no addition to the lead yet, but I think that the current lead is a good opening for what is to come in the article. It provides a brief description of the topics that will be discussed throughout the article.

The content that was added to this article provides more examples of the use of social media during the 2020 President Election. Social media use in campaigning for politics gained lots of popularity, and the additions to the article are as up to date as possible and highlight all the different types of social media that is used. This article keeps a neutral tone that is very factual and contains no biases. It is an easy to read article that provides lots of facts and research about how social media played a large role in the 2020 election. There is no persuasion in this article and does not try to change opinions or make readers think they are trying to be convinced something.

The sources that were added to this article are reliable and have good information about the topic. The additions to the article clearly reflect the sources used and the content is accurate. The sources found are current have provide good information for every point made in the additions of the article. The sources are well split across all types of articles with sources from NYT and BBC. These sources are credible and mostly provide non-bias information about different aspects of social media in the election. The links of sources work and go to the correct website.

The information that is written is clear and provides new information about social media use in the election. There are some parts in the Third Party section that could go more into depth and be thoroughly explained. Since social media is a large and growing presence, more depth could be added about the Third Parties and how they try to gain popularity with social media since they are not a favorable vote. The additions of the article are broken down well and organized in a way that makes it easy to read and comprehendible. The major parts of the article are talked about, but more information could always be used. There are so many parts of the election that needed social media in order to reach the public in the way it did.

This topic is slightly touched on, but since social media was such a large part of the 2020 election, more information about gen Z impact could be a useful addition. Since there is a section about tiktok it could go more into how gen Z uses social media politically on occasion and the impacts they had in the election.

There are no images that have been added to this article. I think that there could be a lot of use for images added into the article to break up the reading, as well as examples of posts during the 2020 Election. The images could be laid out in a way to show fun images that make the reading seem less heavy on the reading.

Overall, the additions to the article are very good, with credible sources to back up the writing. One of the main things that could be improved is images to show how social media was used during the election and how they had a large impact on it. The additions are neutral and give a good basis of what and why social media was a factor to the 2020 Election.

we are planning on expanding more on tiktik and genz