User:PolymorphomyiaTridentata/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Strauzia longipennis


 * Article Evaluation
 * Really poor in terms of citations, there is no source for any of the biological information.


 * Sources
 * There is a link to the person who added the photo, to their own article about Strauzia longipennis, which feels like it violates some sort of clause. They also only source one thing on their site.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Paracantha cultaris


 * Article Evaluation
 * Very little info on biology, sourceless.


 * Sources
 * Only sources are for Taxonomic info, plus a note on range.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Tephritis araneosa


 * Article Evaluation
 * Weirdly formatted, no info on history or biology.


 * Sources
 * Badly sourced, only sources that make sense are those for the taxonomic info. The 3rd and 4th source don't make sense because they must be about the distribution data, but are attached to a sentence just saying that this is a species.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Rhagoletis suavis


 * Article Evaluation
 * Little info on the life cycle.


 * Sources
 * This sources to BugGuide, which seems a bit strange since that's another wikipedia-like source. Also, there's sort of the subjective "can be confused with" section, that omits the other walnut-infesting flies that look similar to suavis and occupy a similar range.

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Paracantha culta


 * Article Evaluation
 * No info on life history, largely just about the taxonomy.


 * Sources
 * Citation makes no sense for number 5 because it must be about the distribution data, but are attached to the species sentence.