User:Polyphemus Goode/Anti-stylometry bibliography

Mined and not going in to the article

 * I think this is superseded by the authors' other paper below.
 * Report & evaluation of a single method.
 * Report & evaluation of a single method.
 * Report & evaluation of a single method.
 * Report & evaluation of a single method.
 * Literature review with some code; review is done better elsewhere.
 * Mathematical theorising. Interesting but not worth putting in.
 * Looks at existing methods, nothing really interesting, groundbreaking or unique enough to go in.
 * Tangential; doesn't bring much to bear on the specific question of adversarial stylometry specifically.
 * Introduces & evaluates a single new method.
 * Literature review with some code; review is done better elsewhere.
 * Mathematical theorising. Interesting but not worth putting in.
 * Looks at existing methods, nothing really interesting, groundbreaking or unique enough to go in.
 * Tangential; doesn't bring much to bear on the specific question of adversarial stylometry specifically.
 * Introduces & evaluates a single new method.
 * Looks at existing methods, nothing really interesting, groundbreaking or unique enough to go in.
 * Tangential; doesn't bring much to bear on the specific question of adversarial stylometry specifically.
 * Introduces & evaluates a single new method.
 * Introduces & evaluates a single new method.
 * Introduces & evaluates a single new method.

Mined and not at all useful

 * Low quality.
 * Nothing useful to say on adversarial stylometry; too early.
 * Low quality and confused.
 * Tackling a different problem.
 * Low quality and confused.
 * Tackling a different problem.
 * Tackling a different problem.
 * Tackling a different problem.