User:Popsgoestheweasel/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
9to5

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because it is a very important movement that is under remembered in the modern era.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article is well intentioned and does a good job of getting the main points of the movement across. All of the information included is relevant to the topic and provides an objective view. The language used is factual and not leading or attempting to influence opinions about the topic. However, he information is very surface level. There are many sections with a single sentence that provides a very general overview of something that happened but does not go into detail. For example, when talking about a documentary made about the topic there was only one sentence. The sentence simply said that there was a documentary released and by who, that's all. They could've added who the major influences were or highlighted the main points made in the documentary. The sources provided were representative of the topic and added to the understanding while reading. There are a few news outlets used such as The Washington Post which is not always great because they can be opinionated writing. But most of the sources used were academic or peer reviewed. There was no activity in the talk page other than to state that the article was used in a class.