User:Porter Bausch/User:Porter Bausch/sandbox/Niahsymone05 Peer Review

General info
Porter Bausch
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Porter Bausch/sandbox - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Peer review lead in:

The article is well written and has a lot of evidence to support his article that he is writing. I am impressed with what going on in the article I think that this is very interesting, what's clear is giving insight on what the whole article is about, and the topics are and gave me insight on each of the problems in the Indian reservation. I think that the changes should be to add the hyperlinks to the end of his sentences, when someone is done reading the sentence a lot of people like to go and see where you got the evidence from, and it would be a good way for people to have easy access to. I think that the structure of the article is very nice, and I like how it is worded, something I will try on my article is combining the paragraphs close to each other just like you so it would be easier to read and won't cause any confusion.

Article Lead Section:

I feel very satisfied with what the importance of the topic is. The lead gives us all of the problems that the topic is facing and have cited evidence to show. The lead doesn't give more weight than what the sections are about, it states more of what going on with the topic. There is nothing missing, and the article is not redundant.

Structure:

The sections are very organized in a good chronological order from the segregation all the way down to covid protocols. The sections do make sense in the way that he put it in order from what happening and why it's happening and what issues are happening currently because of why they what did they did. Each section length is equal to the importance of the subject, he briefly explained what going on and did plagiarize or anything else, the sections are necessary because it relates to the topic. It reflects all the perspectives of published literature, there are no viewpoints missing. It does not persuade the reader from one point of view.

Neutral Content:

I could guess the authors perspective is neutral. There are no words that doesn't make the article feel neutral. It doesn't make any claims, he got all of his cited evidence from the websites and used citations. The article focuses on the negative, stating what the problems are in the Indian reservations.

Reliable Sources:

Most of the sources are reliable, but they rely on self-publish authors and blogs. Most of the statements are attributed to both one and two sources. There are not statements without any kinds of resources, and i cant find all the resources that are stated in the article.

Reviewer Reflection:

I plan on writing paragraphs to make it easier to understand, I will add a lead in section on a better description on my article, and not make my paragraphs too lengthy.