User:Portiapliam/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Essential thrombocythemia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this topic because I personally have ET and already know a lot about it and the health implications. Overall, I think the article was good, however as new research comes to light, it's a bit outdated.

I'd like to look more into pediatric research with MPNs, specifically ET as well as non gene mutation cases.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section --> very concise, overview is solid, might need some more details that are relevant to present research

Content --> is very good but limited

Tones and balance --> neutral stance

Sources and references --> wide variety, from many different dates, relatively current and past

Organization and writing quality --> well organized, easy to follow,

Images and media --> not many images