User:Positive not popular pysch/Flow (psychology)/AvonnaPollard22 Peer Review

General info
Positive not popular psych
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Positive%20not%20popular%20pysch/Flow_%28psychology%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Flow (psychology)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead Section:

The lead section provides a brief introduction to the topic of flow experiences and mentions some unresolved issues related to universal definitions and measurements. However, it would be helpful to provide a clearer definition of what flow experiences entail, especially for readers who may not be familiar with the concept. Consider including a concise explanation of flow experiences and their significance in different domains.

Content:

The content of your article touches upon various aspects of flow experience, such as definitions, measurement approaches, and models. It’s good to see references to recent studies and systematic reviews to support your statements. However, the content lacks a cohesive structure and transitions between the different points being made. Consider organizing the information in a more logical and coherent manner, ensuring that each point flows smoothly into the next.

Tone and balance:

The tone of the article appears informative and neutral. However, it is important to critically evaluate the different perspectives presented in the article.

Sources and references:

Sources are accessible and accurate to the information.

Overall impressions:

The article has potential, but it would benefit from revisions to enhance clarity, coherence, and organization.