User:Positive not popular pysch/Flow (psychology)/PsychgirlTYTY Peer Review

General info
Flow Psychology by Postive not Popular Psych
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Flow (psychology) - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The lead is very concise. The opening sentences are engaging and pleasant to read. The topic is shown very accurately and follows the guidelines of Wiki Edu. I feel that this edit of the lead is very good and very well organized to understand the main topic of flow psychology. The lead was hardly updated by adding to, to improve the information, there.

Content:

The content is revenant to the topic and is not out of date. There are some sources that are older yet there are some from this century. It is a good mix of old and new information that gives the content the nice balance that it needs. The author does address different contributions to flow psychology, yet I could have some improvement for specific equity gaps.

Tone and Balance:

The content added has a neutral stance and is very Intune with the laws of Wiki Edu. I feel that this author was very mindful of the words and the way they can be interpreted. The claim in the article is based on the other researchers and due to that fact, it is not really biased. It is just showing what the researchers claim and feels that their research is. The author does a good job of just being informative none of the research is biased on just one standing point.

Sources and References:

The sources are very diverse and interesting to research on. It is a mix of old and new research as well as information. I feel that this article was able to provide a great range of perspectives.

Organization:

The organization of the article is very concise and easy to flow. It is very convenient that the author took the time to make the article organized. The new information gives a great balance to the former article. The grammar is very good and has shown the work was revised well.

'Overall Impressions: 'This is a good article that taught me something that I did not expect to learn about. Flow psychology the topic was addressed well. I wish that I added more to my own article. I feel that this person should just double-check their sources to make sure they are in line with the Wiki Edu laws and our professor. I need to do the same in order to make sure that I use the pieces of training effectively. I liked the time and effort that is put into this level of organization.