User:Possumsandpages/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:COVID-19 misinformation

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This is a Talk article, so it is not published, but still shows the steps of conversation and gathering the information to publish an article. I selected this because COVID and misinformation are two very important topics in today's world, and I wanted to see what was being reviewed and how it was presented to editors.

Evaluate the article
This article had no grammar errors and was clear that it was still being worked on. It had properly cited sources, although was still conferencing on viability of them. It was great to see multiple editors using many sources and communicating if they were helpful and verifiable. Seeing this side of Wikipedia was helpful to see that it is a team effort and all researches have to take the time to work on this. This article is still being reviewed and researched, as it is not fully clear on what happened or if these conspiracies or speculations are valid. A strength was seeing the amount of sources they are using to try and come to a consensus on this topic. It could be improved possibly by sharing it still even if there isn't a clear answer about the topic? I wouldn't want to confuse people, but saying it is still being reviewed and is ever changing could be helpful for readers to make their own research decisions?