User:Post Qualitative Research/sandbox

Introduction

The passage form Stephen Toulmin’s Cosmopolis: the hidden agenda of modernity (1990) was chosen for two reasons: (1) to illustrate that scholarly research has a long in twisted history, and (2) to contextualize research, and especially postqualitative research, is multidisciplinary. In this essay we will explore some of that context and the origins of postqualitative research.

Before we can understand postqualitative inquiry, we must have an understanding of qualitative inquiry as well as the specific use of the prefix "post." Qualitative research/inquiry as one particular scientific approach to research as a short history. The more extended history begins with Francis Bacon (1561-1626). Before Bacon, many paths to understanding were considered research. Research, even today, has a wide-ranging definition reach. In philosophy, we conduct genealogical research of ideas; we make historical research and many other approaches to understanding philosophy. History, likewise, has many research approaches to data collection and analysis, such as annals, narratives, and a metahistorical analysis. Francis Bacon's defining of the scientific method became the research method, first in the physical sciences and then in the social sciences or, as some prefer, the human sciences[1].

Several strands of philosophical thought have informed qualitative research, including several branches of philosophy including, but not limited to, phenomenology, hermeneutics, positivism, postpositivism, critical theory, and constructivism. For example, Thomas Pernecky (2016) published a philosophical and critical review of qualitative inquiry. In philosophy, Pernecky writes, epistemology and metaphysics are the fundamental philosophical pillars of any research (2016, 3).

The questions listed below directly connect philosophy and scholarly inquiry. These questions in our answers to them will guide much of our thinking in this chapter. Moreover, asking and answering these philosophical questions will influence our choices of methods of data collection and analysis. With some background in the philosophical underpinnings in research, you will be better able to understand what you are doing; explain the choices you make as scholarly inquiries and be provided with a basis for grounding your answers to questions from critics and supporters regarding how you conduct your inquiry projects. It is to the extent that philosophy guides us in understanding these issues that philosophy becomes practical.

Morehouse, 2012

These philosophical questions and the way they are answered are important to understanding postqualitative research. Post qualitative research re-images and disrupts both the paradigms of positivist based (quantitative) and interpretive understandings (qualitative) research.

With that brief background, let us now examine the meaning of "post". A straightforward use of the word “post” may be seen in the use of postmodern as meaning the which comes after that which is modern. This definition was used in Architecture represent structure that followed the rigid, austere style of modernist building. The straight-forward definition, however, becomes more complicated when we look at the definition of postmodern literature. Postmodern literature is characterized by metafiction, unreliable narration, self-reflexivity, and intertextuality (Wikipedia).

In sociology, Anthony Giddens (1991) chooses to write about late modernity rather than postmodernity. However, he cannot avoid the use of the prefix “post.” Giddens’ definition of Modernity mirrors the above definition of postmodern literature. He writes about modernity as the post-traditional order of modernity that includes new forms of mediated experience in which self-identity becomes a reflexive organizational endeavor (5). "The reflexive project of the self, which consists in the situating of coherent, yet continuously revised, biographical narrative, takes place in the context of multiple-choice and is filtered through abstract systems (5).

Postpositivism, sometimes called postempiricism, is a close relative of postmodernism in literature is the metatheoretical stance that critiques the theories and practices of positivism in philosophy, social sciences, and various models of scientific inquiry. It amends rather than contradicts positivism as theorized and practiced. For example, positivists argue that theories and practices may be influenced by observer bias. Postpositivism would also include some forms of qualitative research, though experimental quantitative research is more highly valued.

References

''Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and self-identity: self and society in late modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.''

Morehouse, R. (2012) Beginning interpretative Inquiry: a step-by-step guide to research and evaluation. London: Routledge.

''Pernecky, T. (2016). Epistemology and Metaphysics for Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications.''

Toulmin, S. (1990). Cosmopolis: the hidden agenda of modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1] René Descartes’s Discourse of Method further the separation of the natural and social sciences.