User:Potato.queen97/sandbox

My Mid-Term Quiz for LIBY 1210-09 Fall 2015

My real name is: Aliyah Denny

My Research Topic is: Cultural Appropriation

Key words related to my Research Topic are: culture, appropriation, assimilation, racism

I chose to read and evaluate the article titled: Appropriation (music)

Use the criteria from the Evaluating Wikipedia brochure to evaluate the article. (Get your copy from the Reference Desk.)

1. Is there a warning banner at the top of the article? yes

If there is a warning banner, copy and paste the warning banner here.

Write a brief explanation of the reason the issues mentioned in the warning banner are important. For example, if the issue is “needs additional citations for verification,” why does that matter?

This matters because its important for the reader to receive valid information rather than opinionated information from the article author

2. Is the lead section of the article easy to understand? Does it summarize the key points of the article?

yes

3. Is the structure of the article clear? “Are there several headings and subheadings, images and diagrams at appropriate places, and appendices and footnotes at the end?”

yes

4. Are “the various aspects of the topic balanced well”? That is does it seem to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic?

yes

5. Does the article provide a “neutral point of view”? Does it read like an encyclopedia article instead of a persuasive essay?

No, it gives lots of info but seems biased

6. Are the references and footnotes citing reliable sources? Do they point to scholarly and trustworthy information? Beware of references to blogs; look for references to books, scholarly journal articles, government sources, etc.

No

7. Look for these signs of bad quality and comment on their presence or absence from the article you are evaluating:

a. is the lead section well-written, in clear, correct English?

yes, it is very clear and the grammar is sufficient.

b. are there “unsourced opinions” and/or “value statements which are not neutral”?

yes

c. does the article refer “to ‘some,’ ‘many,’ or other unnamed groups of people,” instead of specific organizations or authors or facts?

yes

d. does the article seem to omit aspects of the topic?

yes

e. are some sections overly long compared to other sections of similar importance to the topic?

Yes, the 'History' and '1900s' sections are unecesarily long

f. does the article lack sufficient references or footnotes?

yes, some of the reference links don't work

g. Look at the Talk Page for the article. As you read the conversation there, do you see hostile dialogue or other evidence of lack of respectful treatment among the editors?

yes