User:Pothosjoy3/Post-traumatic stress disorder/Loyola2024 Peer Review

I am impressed by your contribution and think it will be a valuable addition to the existing wiki article. Your contribution is particularly well sourced and provides up-to-date information in a way that has a balance between cancer relevance and relevance to the topic as a whole. It was difficult to areas of improvement, but here are a few:


 *  Organization:  I would be particularly careful with how you approach organization. Currently, your contributions are lumped together under a section titled "interventions for the treatment of cancer‐related traumatic stress symptoms: a systematic review of the literature." I'm not sure if this is just temporary organization or if you intend to use this category in the actual wikipedia page. I would discourage use of this title and instead consider adding a cancer section underneath the category "Life-threatening illness" in the current wikipedia article.
 *  Current Sources:  While you do have once source from 2019, I would challenge you to find additional sources from the last five years so that you provide the most up to date information possible. Finally, I noticed there is a random number in your first bullet point that
 *  A minor Mistake:  I noticed that the following sentence has a random number in it that I think was a mistake. Assuming is, go ahead and delete the "3." If not, clarify why it is there:
 * Prevalence estimates of cancer‐related PTSD range between 7% and 14%,3 with an additional 10% to 20% of patients experiencing subsyndromal post‐traumatic stress symptoms (ie, PTSS). Both PTSD and PTSS have been associated with increased distress and impaired quality of life, and have been reported in newly diagnosed patients as well as in long‐term survivors.

In the current wiki article, there is a section called "Life-threatening illness" which I think would be a good are to include the majority of your information.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)