User:Ppiazza17/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Sleep-deprived driving

1. '''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? ''' In this article there seem to be no unrelated information regarding this topic. The article starts off in giving a definition of what "Sleep-deprived driving" is. The writers also included subtopics such as the effects on driving performances, comparing to the effects of alcohol, statistics on accidents, and many more. There nothing really distraction on this page, as they all related back to the topic.

2. '''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?''' This article is pretty good in staying neutral when stating the facts. There isn't much claims that appear to have heavily biased toward a particular side. I believe the subtopic, "Physician reporting" can be biased toward how people who drive are impaired, but don't say anything about it, endangering the other people on the road.

3. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? There are many subtopics that seem to be unrepresented with only limited facts. For example, the subtopic of "Government response to sleep-deprived driving", I feel like there isn't sufficient information.

4. '''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Most of the citations links are working except for one. There a website supposedly named: "Sleep Deprivation: Causes and Consequences", but when the link is clicked, it get send to an "page was not found". This possible mean that the website link has changed and or the article was deleted from that website. The article does support the claims as the information was brought from these citations.

5. '''Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?''' Most of the articles came from News such as CNN News and some others from journal articles, and local DMV/roadside websites. Majority of the citations are neutral, beside the News articles that tend to always be biased. But not all the news are biased, for certain not these News articles that were use for citations.

6. '''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?''' Some are the latest informations has been up to date, but there are some that can possibly be up to data on the statistics. I feel like the areas where there isn't much informations such as the government one, can be added with more informations if there can more information added.

7. '''Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?''' There are some grammatical errors that the writers suggested to each other. There are some rephrasing of paragraph to sound more professionally. There are good critics and tips and suggestions on how to make the article better.

8. '''How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?''' The article is unrated or unknown and I do not believe it part of any WikiProject from what I can tell from this article.

9. How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Wikipedia is an open source for people to edit in order to provide valid informations for the audiences who are of needs or interests in knowing the information on a particular topic. It is different how we have talked about it in class in how we see Wikipedia to be known to not be a reliable sources due to being open access to the public, but it can get you off on a start on a particular topic and then researchers can research off from Wikipedia and find valid/credible articles that are guaranteed to be verifiable.

Lead Section
Traffic collision Myocardial infarction Daylight saving time
 * this article briefly talks about the traffic control and how and what cause "traffic collision". It went over the the causes and prevention of traffic collision. It also provide the history and how it economically effecting us.
 * there this section on "health effects" that I believe isn't sufficient enough to provide what the health effects have on the physical and psychological.
 * This article is about how heart attack occur and what it is. It briefly went over the causes of heart attacks and explain the process of how a heart attack occurs.
 * Under the section others, I would like to add another cause for myocardial infraction that was related to the research of my project. I want to input how DST can also increase the risk of heart attack and how it associate to the cause of MI.
 * This article talks about what DST is all about and the background behind it.
 * Under the section, "permanent daylight saving time" I'm not sure what I want to do here, but I feel like I may want to add to this conversation.

Actual Edits
Psychological: "Following some collisions long lasting psychological problems may occur. These issues may make those who have been in a crash afraid to drive again. In some cases, the psychological trauma may affect individuals' ability to work and take on family responsibilities."


 * 1) Traffic collision Under "Health Effects" section: I wants to add, "...life can cause difficulty to go to work, attend school, or even getting out of bed in the morning let alone take on family responsibilities due to the most common stress disorder known as PTSD."
 * 2) Myocardial infarction Under "Others" section: I wants to add, "Swedish researchers found out that there is a 5% increase of heart attacks immediately following DST in the spring."
 * 3) Daylight saving time Under "Permanent daylight saving time" section: I wants to add, "Recently in 2018, in Florida 'Governor Rick Scott signed up off on legislation on Friday, March 23 making the daylight saving time in the Sunshine State year-round"