User:Ppowers2001/Malian Family Code/Richa Amin Peer Review

Overall the article was very solid. The subcategories flowed well and the content remained neutral. I liked the overall structure of the article and the quotes/resources you provided. That being said, a lot of your sources aren't journals/textbooks and more heavily news sources (remember that you need at least 10 scholarly works). Maybe diversify your sources a bit more. Also check the links out for sources 9 and 10 in your references; the link leads you to a weird website. Your link for source 6 can't be reached. Other than that, the content is fine and the writing flows well with a good neutral tone with relevant information, so good job.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)