User:Pragya1999/Evaluate an Article

Anemone blanda

 * Anemone blanda: Anemone blanda
 * I have chosen this article to evaluate because it's related to the topic I want to write my own article on.

Lead

 * The article includes an introductory sentence that clearly describes the topic. It does not include a description of the major sections of the article because it only contains a Lead. The lead is concise and but slightly overly detailed.

Content
The article does not have any content other than a lead paragraph and an image of the plant with species information.

Tone and Balance
The article is neutral with no biased claims. There are no viewpoints that are over- or underrepresented. The article doesn't persuade the reader in favor of or away from a position.

Sources and References
Most of the facts are backed up by reliable secondary sources. Some of the links to the references and sources do not open, but the ones that do are current and have thorough information that reflect the topic.

Organization
The article is mostly well-written. A couple of sentences are not as clear and easy to read as the others. The article does not have any errors. It is mostly well-organized.

Images and Media
The article includes one image of the plant with information about the species. It definitely enhances the understanding of the topic. The image is well-captioned and adheres to the copyright regulations. It's laid out in a visually appealing way.

Checking the talk page
The conversations are about adding new citations and links. The article is rated Stub which is low to mid. The article is part of WikiProjects Lebanon and WikiProjects Plants.

Overall impressions
The quality of this article is rated as Stub. It needs more content and better secondary sources. It is underdeveloped and needs a lot more editing and work to make it a strong article.