User:PranavRamesh2478/Hindu eschatology/Pdugar2 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

PranavRamesh2478


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PranavRamesh2478/Hindu_eschatology?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Hindu eschatology

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic, Hindu eschatology, and is a good first step to filling the article with relevant applications of eschatology.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

'''The article is neutral, but the tone seems to be more of an essay format than an encyclopedic one. I would suggest rewriting some of the draft before publishing.'''

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No; the content is factual and balanced.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

The references are still in MLA format; make sure to edit this before publishing.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

The information comes from scholarly secondary sources; one of the sources expresses bias in it's title ("The use of cow dung and urine to cure COVID-19 in India: A public health concern."), so it would be wise to address this bias in the article.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

The information is all up to date.