User:Pratyya Ghosh/CVUA/Darylgolden

Hello, welcome to your Counter Vandalism Unit Academy page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your academy page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working). If you have any general queries about anti-vandalism (or anything else), you are more than welcome to raise them with me at my talk page.

Make sure you read through Vandalism as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.


 * How to use this page

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.

I'll use 3 marks to examine your tests.
 * Examining your Tests
 * ✅ Good answer; correctly addresses all points relevant to the question and shows a sound understanding of the issues involved.
 * Nearly a good answer, just something is missing-I will say what
 * Wrong answer; shows a misunderstanding or wrong answer

Twinkle
One of the best anti-vandalism tools is Twinkle, and is what I recommend all my students use for anti-vandalism work. If you have not already installed it, please do so in the Gadgets section of your Preferences page. Let me know if you need any help; sign below when you have have Twinkle installed.

Have a nice day! Darylgolden (talk) 23:03, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Good faith and vandalism
When patrolling for vandalism, you may often come across edits which are unhelpful, but not vandalism - these are good faith edits. It is important to recognise the difference between a vandalism edit and a good faith edit, especially because Twinkle gives you the option of labelling edits you revert as such. Please read WP:Vandalism WP:AGF and WP:NOT VANDALISM before getting your tasks.
 * I have read the articles (I don't want to use the ✅ template for fear of confusion) Have a nice day! Darylgolden (talk) 12:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Test (Theoretical)
All right. Hope you've read everything. Now it's time for the test. I'll take 2 tests. One is theoretical and the other one is practical. Each one will contain 50 marks and the total is 100. Now here's you test.

1.) What is Good Faith and Vandalism. Give their definition and a short description. Tell me the difference between Good Faith and Vandalism. (this question contains 20 marks. It has 5 questions in it. If you give right answer you''l get full 20)
 * A:-A good faith edit is an edit intended to help and improve Wikipedia, although it may be unconstructive or somewhat disruptive. Vandalism is intended to disrupt Wikipedia intentionally, often through the use of adding profanities or deliberately making factual errors. The underlying difference between the two that although both may be somewhat disruptive, a good faith edit was not made to intentionally disrupt Wikipedia, while vandalism is. As such, test edits, unintentionally making template errors, not following general editing guidelines (such as WP:NOR or WP:NPOV) while the editor was trying to improve the article is not vandalism but good faith edits.
 * ✅ A bit short, but okay. You've answered full. No problem. 20/20

2.) I am giving you 5 examples. You'll tell me whether they are vandalism or Good faith. (Each one contains 2. The total is 10)
 * -Good faith.
 * ✅ Yeah. 2/2


 * -Good faith.
 * ✅ Good. 2/2


 * -Good faith.
 * No. It was a big amount of removal which contains a good amount of information without a summary or discussion. It's vandalism. 0/2


 * -Vandalism.
 * ✅ Okay. 2/2


 * -Vandalism.
 * ✅ Yes. 2/2
 * Total obtained mark for Question 2 is 8/10

3.) Suppose User:Ghosh10 is vandalizing Wikipedia.
 * 3a.) How'll you spot Ghosh10's vandalism?
 * A:-I would usually use Lupin's Antivandal tool to detect vandalism.
 * ✅ Yeah. Okay you can use tools to detect vandalism. 5/5
 * 3b.) What will you do to respond his Vandalism?
 * A:-I would use Twinkle to revert his vandalism and warn him using the appropriate template. If the user has not received a warning, I will warn him with the level 2 template. If the editor has already been warned and has sufficient time to read the warning, I will elevate the warning. If the editor has already received a level 4 template and has already had enough time to read the template, I will report him at WP:ANI.
 * No, if the user hasn't received a warning you will not warn him with the level 2 template. You will warn that user with level 1. Others are right. 4/5
 * Total obtained mark for Question 3 is 9/10

4.) Suppose User:Lionel Messi is a newcomer and making Good edits. He created Jackvill 77. You fix the format issues on the page and you have reverted his edit on Lionel Messi. A few minutes later, you get a nasty note on your talk page which states that you have caused him an edit conflict by performing your few minor corrections. He was unaware of how to correct an edit conflict, and therefore lost everything he was trying to do also he thinks that his edit at Messi page was absolutely right but you know that his edit was right not suitable for Wiki. He takes this to WP:ANI that you are not a good user, you should be blocked............ as he lost many information due that conflict
 * 4a.) Will you still assume good faith after this situation and why?
 * A:-Despite my anger about the situation, I will still assume good faith as he was unaware of Wikipedia policies and he tried to make useful contributions to Wikipedia.
 * ✅ Yes, you'll still assume good-faith. 5/5
 * 4b.) How'll you handle this situation?
 * A:-I will first respond at WP:ANI explaining the situation. Then I will leave a message on his talk page explaining that I did not mean to make you lose your edits as no one could have forseen that I was editing at the same time as the editor. I will explain why his edit on Lionel Messi was incorrect (I'm assuming he tried to insert information about himself) as the article describes the footballer and he should place information about himself on his userpage. I will then explain how he should deal with edit conflicts. I will apologize anyways for his loss of information and tell him that other Wikipedia contributors can add the information if he does not wish to. If he, however, persists in calling me a bad user, I will probably not respond and let other users deal with the matter.
 * ✅ Brilliant. You've wrote everything I wanted. 6/5
 * Total obtained mark for Question 4 is 11/10

Result (Theoretical)
Great job. You've passed the theoretical test. I would let you pass if you've achieved 80%-85% (or more) or 40-43 (or more) marks. But you've achieved 48 which means 96%. So you've passed. Here's you result.

Test (Practical)
Now spot (just spot and revert, you don't need to warn now. it'll be on next level) and revert 10 Vandalisms or Good Faith edits. Then put the diffs here; (correct detection means 5 marks. wrong means no. Full marks is 50)

1.)
 * ✅ Yes. 5/5

2.)
 * ✅ Good revert. 5/5

3.)
 * ✅ Yeah. Right. 5/5

4.)
 * ✅ Good job. 5/5

5.)
 * ✅ Added some unwanted letters. Good. 5/5

6.)
 * ✅ 5/5

7.)
 * ✅ Yeah, vandalism. 5/5

8.)
 * ✅ Right. 5/5

9.)
 * ✅ 5/5

10.)
 * ✅ Good job. 5/5

Result (Practical)
Great job. You've passed the practical test. I would let you pass if you've achieved 80%-85% (or more) or 40-43 (or more) marks. But you've achieved 50 which means 100%. So you've passed. Full marks. Great. Go on like this. Here's you result.

Result (Lesson 1)
Here's the final result. You have achieved 48 out of 50 in Theoretical and 50 out of 50 in practical. The summation of this is 98 out of 100! Wah! 98% marks! You are doing awesome. Go on like this.

Warning and reporting
As you know, we are using Twinke, which is very useful for warning users. When you use Twinkle to warn a user, you have a number of options to choose from: you can select the kind of warning (for different offences), and the level of warning (from 1 to 4, for increasing severity). Knowing which warning to issue and what level is very important. Further information can be found at WP:UWUL. Also please read WP:VANDALISM.

Comments

 * Let me know when you are done reading these contents.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 06:33, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm done reading the pages. Have a nice day! Darylgolden (talk) 00:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Test (Theoretical)

 * This theoretical test contains 80 marks. I'll convert it to 40 when making the result. Good luck.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 12:36, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

1.) Please answer the following questions;

1a.) Why do we warn users?
 * A:-We warn users so that they know what was wrong with their edits and hopefully learn from their mistakes, before a block or ban is enforced. It can also serve as a deterrence (users might stop after knowing that they can be blocked), even against bad faith users.
 * ✅ 4/4

1b.) How'll you warn users; (I'm asking about the warning level)
 * User hasn't received any warnings:-I will start with a level 1 warning, unless a level 4im warning is appropriate.
 * So right 2/2


 * User has received warning previously:-
 * ❌ No answers here. The answer is higher than the previous one. Unfortunately 0/2
 * The total is 2/4

1c.) When would a 4im warning be appropriate?
 * A:-It would be appropriate in the case of excessive, blatant, and continuous violations of a certain policy.
 * But you could be more clear. Like after level 4 warning a 41m is appropriate. I'm cutting 1. 3/4

1d.) What should you do if a user who has received a level 4 or 4im warning vandalizes again? Also If a user has vandalized twice but has not received any warnings, what will you do then?
 * A:-I will report them to WP:ANI.
 * A little mistake. Not to WP:ANI but WP:AIV. You should not post it to the Administrators Incidents. 3/4'''

1e.) In which situations only one warning will be given to a user?
 * A:-When there is a strict policy about a certain action and a sanction must be imposed if the user persists.
 * ✅ You are right. But there's 3 point in WP:VANDALISM about this. Remember them too. 4/4

2.) Tell me when these templates will be appropiate;

2a.) :-When the user engages in unconstructive removal of content from articles (usually blanking).
 * ✅ 2/2

2b.) :-When the user engages in vandalism (bad-faith edits intended to hurt the site).
 * ✅ 2/2

2c.) :-When the user engages in personal attacks.
 * ✅ 2/2

2d.) :-When the user seems to have made a test edit, which was reverted by someone other than the user.
 * ✅ 2/2

2e.) :-When the user inserts copyrighted information into an article (directly copying from non-free srticles) or uploaded copyrighted files.
 * ✅ 2/2

2fg.) :-When the user removes a speedy delete template from a page made by the user.
 * ✅ 2/2

2g.) :-When the user inserts humourous, unencyclopedic content into an article.
 * ✅ 2/2

2h.) :-When the user uploads unencyclopedic or inappropriate files.
 * I'm cutting 1 here. You can upload a free unencyclopedic image. Your own pic is unencyclopedic, But you are allowed to upload that. This warning should be given to a user for uploading non-constructive files. 1/2

2i.) :-When the user removes an AfD template from a page.
 * ✅ 2/2

2j.) :-When a user engages in page-move vandalism (moving pages to inappropriate names, possibly vulgarities or obscenities).
 * ✅ Also moving without any discussion. 2/2

3.) Now give 10 more examples of single level warning template and multi-level warning templates and write why and when they should be used. (You should not write different levels of the same warning. Exclude the 10 warnings given up)

3a.) When a user inserts biased content into an article. Such actions is not allowed as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and its aim is to provide unbiased information.
 * ✅ 2/2

3b.) When a user personally attacks another user. Such actions is not allowed as users are expected to remain civil in conversations and be respectful of other users.
 * ✅ 2/2

3c.) When a user's username might be in violation of the username policy, such as when it represents a company or contains vulgarities.
 * ✅ 2/2

3d.) When a user treats a talk page like a forum. The talk page is meant to facilitate discussions on how to improve the article, not to talk about the general topic itself.
 * ✅ 2/2

3e.) When a user claims ownership of sn article, reverting all or most of other user's edits. Users should respect other's edits and not revert them just because it was created by themselves.
 * ✅ 2/2

3f.) When a user reverts edits by another user that (s)he does not agree with, which is not vandalism or in violation of the BLP policy,  three times in a time-span of a day. Edit-warring is not allowed as it does not help to solve issues. Editors are expected to discuss about the matter amicably.
 * ✅ 2/2

3g.) When a user makes a test but reverts it himself.
 * ✅ Yes, but it's for the newbies. If an admin or experienced user do this then they'll not get warned cause we know they'll not test with bad words or anything bad. 2/2

3h.) When a user tries to censor vulgarities or obscenities used in a formal, encyclopedic way. Wikipedia is not intended to be censored.
 * ✅ 2/2

3i.) When a inserts blatant advertisements onto a page. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a soapbox for advertisement.
 * ✅ 2/2

3j.) When a user does not provide edit summaries for his edits. Edit summaries are required as they tell other users what their edits is about so that they do not have to show changes to see what the user had done. I kinda qualify for this
 * ✅ 2/2

*(Take help from this and this page when you are answering 4-11)

4.) Suppose User:Ghosh10 is adding advertisements to articles. Which warning will you use to warn him?
 * A:-
 * ✅ 2/2

5.) Suppose User:John Kerry has added an original research to John Kerry article. Which warning will be appropriate?
 * A:-
 * ✅ Yes. 2/2

6.) Suppose I'm vandalizing Airtel article. I'm adding business infos, there marketing. You can tell overall that I'm using WP as business with that article. Which template will be appropriate to warn me?
 * A:-
 * Sorry, the uw-spam is used for adding inappropriate external links. Here you should use . Sorry, but 0/2

7.) Suppose User:Thiago Silva is editing your talk page without any reason or good reason. Which template will be appropriate to warn him?
 * A:-
 * ✅ 2/2

8.) Suppose you have a userpage that doesn't follow the policy. Which warning template will be appropriate for you?
 * A:-
 * ✅ 2/2

9.) Suppose User:Barrack Obama is editing wiki. He is doing good. But he isn't writing any edit summary. More than 2000+ edits doesn't have any edit summary. What warning will be appropriate for Mr.President him?
 * A:-
 * ✅ Yeah don't forget to warn Mr. President . 2/2

10.) Suppose User:Lakhdar Brahimi is continuously editing in Arabic. What warning will be appropriate for him?
 * A:-
 * ✅ Exactly 2/2

11.) Suppose User:Katie Homes has created 8 articles and all got deleted. His articles don't follow WP guidelines Which warning will be appropriate?
 * A:-
 * Nah! this is for disrupting wiki. You need to use in this case. Unfortunately 0/2

12.) What's WP:3RR? Tell me everything you know about this. How'll you handle a situation of WP:3RR? What are the exemptions of 3RR?
 * A:-3RR is a policy on edit-warring that indicates that editors should not revert an edit that they do not agree with more than 3 times in one day. However, gaming the system by reverting just after the time period is not allowed and stopping only after the 3rd revert is also considered bad practice. I will warn users with . If they persist, I will report them to WP:AN3. Reverting vandalism, BLP issues, or legal violations are exempt from this.
 * You haven't answered the last question What are the exemptions of 3RR?. The answer is
 * Reverting self edits
 * Reverting on your userspace
 * Reverting blatant vandalism
 * Reverting copyvio
 * Reverting additions which is illegal in US Law, such as Child Pornography
 * Reverting biased contents, something poor or unsourced and anything that violates BLP Policy.
 * You haven't answered one question. That's why 3/4

Result (Theoretical)
Great job. You've passed the theoretical test. This exam's full marks was 80. But I've converted it to 40. In 80 you've got 70 So in 40 you get half on 70 means 35. But if you were a bit careful you could get 40. But don't worry you achieved 87.5% marks. It's pass marks. But please read these topics again.

Test (Practical)
Now nothing's perfect without practical. Here do some practical work. '''Find and revert some vandalism. Warn each user appropriately, using the correct kind of warning and level. Report 2 users at WP:AIV''' Put the diff of revert and your warning. Remember diff in both case. Don't need to remove and. Just use diffs replacing  and 

1.)Vandalism revert and Warnings;

1a.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Good 2/2

1b.) and
 * and ❌
 * Revert is right, but warning is not right. It's obviously vandalism. Should be warned with {{subst:uw-vandalism}} 1/2

1c.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Yeah. It was a test edit. But you could warn this user with uw-vandalism 2/2

1d.) and
 * and
 * ✅Yeah. It's defamatory. If you used {{subst:uw-vandalism}} it wouldn't be much wrong. 2/2

1e.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Good. It has a slight chance to warn with {{subst:uw-joke}} But it's up to you. You can warn with {{subst:uw-vandalism}} 2/2

1f.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Good. it's test. 2/2

1g.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Good job. 2/2

1h.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Yeah. 2/2

1i.) and
 * and
 * ✅ I'm giving you full marks. But this IP could be warned with {{subst:uw-vandalism}}. Cause for it's edit a blue link became red. But anyway 2/2

1j.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Yeah. IP should be warned with uw-test. Cause other warning would be too much. As user doesn't know the policy. But you could use {{subst:uw-vandalism}}. 2/2

1k.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Good. A third level warning.... Yehe! you know how to use higher level warnings. 2/2

1l.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Yeah. Vandalism. 2/2

1m.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Good work. 2/2

1n.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Wao!! You are doing just great!! 2/2

1o.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Yeah, this IP tested in that page. 2/2

1p.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Good. 2/2

1q.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Yeah straight vandalism. 2/2

1r.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Wrong link given here. But all right. 2/2

1s.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Good. 2/2

1t.) and
 * and
 * ✅ Both are fine. 2/2
 * So the total is 39/40. Good job here.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 14:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

2.) Report at WP:AIV. (Give the diff here too.)

2a.)
 * ✅ Good job. 10/10

2b.)
 * ✅ Yeah, Okay. 10/10
 * S0 you get 20/20 in this No. 2 Question. -- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 14:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Result (Practical)
Great job. You've passed the practical test. I would let you pass if you've achieved 90% (or more) or 54 (or more) marks. But you've achieved 59 which means 99%+. So you've passed. Go on like this. Here's you result.

Result (Lesson 2)
Here's the final result. You have achieved 35 out of 40 in Theoretical and 59 out of 60 in practical. The summation of this is 94 out of 100! Wao! 94% marks! You are doing awesome. Go on like this.

Protection
Protecting can be used to prevent and deal with vandalism. Only anadministrator can protect however, anyone can or request protection. Please read WP:PROTECT.
 * Hi, I have read the page. Darylgolden ( talk ) 11:24, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Test (Theoretical)
Sorry for the delay but here's you theoretical test for lesson 3. It's easy. The full marks is 80. If you have read this page well then you'll get a full marks. But if you can get 85% marks or more then you'll be passed. Good luck. -- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 14:50, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

1.) What do you think is protection in Wikipedia?
 * A:- Protection is a feature that can be applied to pages to prevent certain user groups from editing the pages, usually implemented in high-risk pages that can cause widespread damage to the site (eg. highly used templates) or high-visibility ones (main page, important articles such as Steve Jobs).
 * ✅ Well said. 5/5

2.) Describe them. (Just tell what it does)
 * Full protection :- Allows only administrators to edit.
 * 2/2


 * Semi-protection :- Allows only users with autoconfirmed or confirmed status or higher to edit (IPs and new accounts cannot edit)
 * 2/2


 * Creation protection :- Allows only administrators to create a certain page.
 * I'm giving you full marks here. But remember create protection isn't only for sysops. An admin can set the create protection level for a page [create=autoconfirmed]


 * Move protection :- Allows only administrators to move a page.
 * Same as no.3. move protection can be set as [move=autoconfirmed]


 * Upload protection :- Allows only administrators to upload new revisions of a file.
 * Same as no.3. Upload protection can be set as [upload=autoconfirmed]
 * ✅ Good answers here. 10/10

3a.) Tell me in what circumstances should a page be semi-protected?
 * A:- A page should be semi-protected if it is a high-visibility pages (such as Bill Gates) which is especially prone to vandalism since many users view it and vandals understand that vandalism on these pages do the most impact or if the topic is highly controversial and is subject to continuous edit warring.
 * Yeah. 2/2

3b.) When an admin should use Upload Protection?
 * A:- When the image is prone to vandalism or in cases of high-use images (such as File:Example.jpg).
 * Missed one thing. "Files subject to a dispute between editors". But you are right. 2/2

3c.) When Create protection is needed?
 * A:- When a page is created many times but deleted, often due to vandalism or search terms of the sidebar (eg. random article).
 * Good. 2/2

3d.) In what time a Full Protection will be appropriate?
 * A:- It would be appropriate when the page is undergoing constant edit wars or vandalism by autoconfirmed/confirmed users.
 * Great. 2/2

3e.) When you should request for a Move protection?
 * A:- When the page is subject to page-move vandalism or if there is a discussion about moving the page so that users do not prematurely move the page before consensus if reached.
 * Some parts you missed. Such as highly visible page is move protected, cause it has no reason to be moved. But all right. 2/2
 * ✅ So here you get 10/10

4a.) How many levels are there for Pending Protection? What are they?
 * A:- There are 2 levels. The first level allows autoconfirmed users and higher to edit a page without needing their edits to be reviewed by a reviewer. The second level requires all users except reviewers and administrators to have their edits reviewed before going live. However the second level is not currently used.
 * Good. 2/2

4b.) What happens if a page is pending protected?
 * A:- Certain users need to have their reviews reviewed by a reviewer before going live.
 * 4/4

4c.) When it's appropriate to request a pending protection?
 * A:- When the page is subject to vandalism or BLP issues but not semi-protected or protected to encourage editing by good-faith editors.
 * . Yeah right. But remember Copyvio can be pending protection issue. But you described brilliantly. 4/4
 * ✅ Great. 10/10

5.) What's permanent protection? What kind of pages are permanently protected?
 * A:- Permanent protection is full protection except that administrators cannot remove the protection. Users' personal user scripts are permanently protected as well as pages that should always be protected such as the main page.
 * ✅ Yeah. Good. 5/5

6.) What do you think is Cascading protection? Tell me in your own word. When this kind of protection should be used?
 * A:- Cascading protection is protection where the page itself is protected as well as all other pages that is used by that page. It should be used to prevent the vandalism of certain important pages by vandalising other pages that the page uses.
 * ✅ Good. 5/5

7.) What's office action? Tell me everything you know.
 * A:- Office protection is pages protected by the Wikimedia foundation often because of certain legal issues. Such pages should never be unprotected by an administrator without consent from the Wikimedia foundation.
 * ✅ Absolutely right. 5/5

8.) How'll you propose edit or modify a fully protected page?
 * A:- I will post an edit request on its talk page.
 * ✅ I would love that if you posted the template. But anyway. 5/5

9.) When do you think your user talk page needs to be semi protected? If your talk page is semi protected what'll you do for those users who're not auto-confirmed?
 * A:- When it is being vandalised by a lot of IP and new user vandals. I may direct them to another user's talk page and ask them to forward the query to me.
 * Yeah. But I think there's flaw here. You can do that if you want. But that's not a good way of communicating. Users whose talk pages are semi-protected should have an unprotected user talk subpage linked conspicuously from their main talk page to allow good faith comments from non-autoconfirmed users You should have a subpage of your talkpage. 3/5

10.) Should blocked user's talk page be protected?
 * A:- No, if the blocked user vandalises his/her talk page, the setting for talk page editing should be set to disabled.
 * ✅ You haven't answered full. Your answer is half right. Some times Arbitration Committee protects blocked user's talkpage. But that's rare. That's why I'm giving you full 5/5

11.) What'll you do (Suppose you are an admin) to those users user page who are not with us in this beautiful planet, in other word died? Should you protect them? Why?
 * A:- Yes. The pages are prone to vandalism as the user cannot monitor the pages.
 * ✅ Okay. 5/5

12.) When a page is protected a protection template is added at the top of the page. Now write 10 templates and tell why they're used

12a.) Pp-full - to inform users the page is fully protected.
 * 1/1

12b.) Pp-semi - to inform users the page is semi-protected.
 * 1/1

12c.) Pp-create - to inform users the page is creation protected.
 * 1/1

12d.) Pp-move - to inform users the page is move protected.
 * 1/1

12e.) Pp-pc1 - to inform users the page is pending changes 1 protected.
 * 1/1

12f.) Pp-pc2 - to inform users the page is pending changes 2 protected.
 * 1/1

12g.) Pp-vandalism - to inform users the page is protected due to vandalism.
 * 1/1

12h.) Pp-office - to inform users the page is protected due to office actions.
 * 1/1

12i.) Pp-template - to inform users the page is protected because it is a high-use template.
 * 1/1

12j.) Pp-dispute - to inform users the page is protected because it is undergoing a content dispute.
 * 1/1
 * ✅ So here you get 10/10

Result (Theoretical)
Great job. You've passed the theoretical test. This exam's full marks was 80. In 80 you've got 78. Great! You have achieved 97.5% marks! That's just magnificent and it's obviously passable.

Test (Practical)
Now request 4 pages correctly for protection. Give the article name which you've requested for protection and give the diff of Requests_for_page_protection.

1. Cheeseburger and
 * ✅ Yeah, 5/5

2. Peanut butter and
 * ✅ 5/5

3. Biscuit and
 * ✅ Right 5/5

4. List of Google hoaxes and easter eggs and  Darylgolden ( talk ) 01:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ 5/5

Result (Practical)
Great job. You've passed the practical test. I would let you pass if you've achieved 80% (or more) or 16 (or more) marks. But you've achieved 20 which means 100%. So you've passed. Go on like this. Here's you result.

Result (Lesson 3)
Here's the final result. You have achieved 78 out of 80 in Theoretical and 20 out of 20 in practical. The summation of this is 98 out of 100! Whoa! 98% marks! Just magnificent. Go on like this.

Speedy deletion
Deleting a page is an additional measures that can be used to prevent and deal with vandalism. Only anadministrator can delete pages; however, anyone can nominate a page for deletion. If you have Twinkle installed, you can use the Twinkle menu to request speedy deletion (the CSD options). Please read WP:CSD. for more information.
 * Hi, I have read that page. Darylgolden ( talk ) 05:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Test (Theoretical)
Here's you theoretical test for lesson 4. It contains 80 marks. But I'll convert it to 40. If you've read the rules well then you'll be able to get full 80. Good luck -- Pr at yya   (Hello!) 14:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

1.) What is Speedy Deletion?Tell me in your own words. (It contains 2 marks)
 * A:-

2.) Tell me the difference of Deletion and Speedy Deletion. (It contains 2 marks)
 * A:-

3.) Write what are these templates, why these template are used? How they are used. How they are posted in articles. (It contains 20 marks)

3a.) G1 :- 3b.) G2 :- 3c.) G3:- 3d.) G7:- 3f.) G9:- 3g.) G13:- 3h.) A1:- 3i.) A2:- 3j.) A3:- 3k.) A5:- 3l.) A7:- 3m.) A11:- 3n.) T2:- 3o.) T3:- 3p.) U1:- 3q.) U2:- 3r.) C1:- 3s.) U3:- 3t.) P1:-

4. Now write 24 Templates with there name, work and how they are used. (It should contain all the F criteria, 6 G criteria don't use the ones which I have used, 2 A criteria, again don't use the same, All R criteria, and the others you like without using the same criterias from 3.) (It contains 24 marks)

4a.) 4b.) 4c.) 4a.) 4d.) 4e.) 4f.) 4g.) 4h.) 4i.) 4j.) 4k.) 4l.) 4m.) 4n.) 4o.) 4p.) 4q.) 4r.) 4s.) 4t.) 4u.) 4v.) 4w.) 4x.)

5.) Suppose User:Karim has created a page named Hif. But now he has blanked the article. Which warning will be useful here and why? Also he wants to delete his userpage. What criteria and template he should use? (It contains 3 marks)
 * A:-

6.) Suppose a user has created an article about John Kerry. But it's not actually important and notable. Which template and criteria will be useful here? Why? (It contains 3 marks)
 * A:-

7.) Suppose a user has uploaded a file which has lack of license. So it needs to be deleted. Which criteria and template should be used here? (It contains 3 marks)
 * A:-

8.) Suppose another user has created an article which has insufficient context to identify the subject. Which criteria and template will be useful here? (It contains 3 marks)
 * A:-

9.) Johnny Black is a page which is full of advertise. Which criteria and template will be useful here to request Speedy? (It contains 3 marks)
 * A:-

10.) Test is created to test Wp style. Which criteria and warning should be used here. Why it should be that? In which cases you shouldn't use that criteria? (It contains 4 marks)
 * A:-

11.) Mark Goodluck is a new page. But unfortunately you don't understand what's written there. It's in English but it's meaningless to you. Which criteria and template you'll use to request Speedy? (It contains 3 marks)
 * A:-

12.) Template:Hi! is a misrepresentation of WP Policy. Which speedy criteria and template is useful here? (It contains 3 marks)
 * A:-

13.) What will use to request speedy delete a page that contains pure vandalism and another page which doesn't have any content? (It contains 3 marks)
 * A:-

14.) A file misses a non-free use rationale tag. Which criteria and template should be used here? If the file has a improper license which criteria and template should be used? (It contains 4 marks)
 * A:-