User:Praxidicae/Fake source project/Table

Key

 * Owner: there are distinct groups doing this with SEO spam. Example, the first one is "kravitzcj [at] gmail.com" which is what we're looking for.
 * Sniped: Many of these were at one point legitimate (or at least not their current iteration, ie. thefrisky, vermontrepublic) so we should go through and replace w/ archived links where possible.
 * Notes: this should not contain anything lengthy, a * indicates there are relevant notes on the individual linked page
 * Type: there are multiple types of these sources, blatant spam (ie. spambot/SEO spam) with no other intent or value, blackhat SEO (the majority) which are fake news sites set up for clients/PR firms to push press releases, interviews, etc...that present themselves as legitimate journalist sites and similar to that, pay-for-publication sites that might be partially reliable (ie. Times of India) but do not distinguish between their paid for pieces or press releases or are otherwise unreliable, this type usually will be the most difficult to deal with and will likely need consensus at RSN. We should identify these in the table as: SPAM, BHS, P4P and lastly UGU should be used for user generated/unreliable (in the same family as Medium style publications)
 * discussion: this should link to discussions if they exist (ie. RSN, other RFCs), if they do not but are likely required please put a capital R