User:Price22/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Michael Faraday

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am majoring in Electrical Engineering, and Michael Faraday is one of the most important figures in Electrical Engineering, and one of my personal favorites.

Evaluate the article
Overall the lead of the article is mostly fine, but contains a bit of information that is never mentioned again in the rest of the article, mainly about how he never had a rigorous training in mathematics like one might expect. Most of the content is relevant to Faraday, however I dislike the commemorations about various things that were named after him, and awards he was given posthumously. I feel like it is important to have that list somewhere, but that it would belong better in a different article. The content is very up to date with the most recent edit being in September 2021. The article seems fairly neutral, although it does refer to him being one of the most influential scientists of all time, which I think is objectively true, however some might take issue with. All of the sources are from academic sources, and all of the sources seem to work fine. I think the Organization of the article is where it goes downhill because often times I find myself confused by the wording and sentence structure of the article. Additionally while events are grouped up into chronological groups, they jump all over the place in the timeline of those groups. Additionally, only some of the important events that Faraday has contributed to the scientific community have dates, while others have no mention of dates. The images are fine, captioned correctly and sourced correctly, however I feel like they do not do much to enhance the article. The talk page does not see much discussion, and the article is a level-3 vital article and apart of 11 WikiProjects. I think the article is mostly fine with its content, but the organization of the article could stand to see a lot of improvement.