User:Prikale/Evaluate an Article

I chose to evaluate the article regarding memory, as it is related to our course. Regarding evaluating content, everything in the article is relevant to the topic and the organization made it such that nothing distracted me. Information to be added could be regarding changes organization of the types of memory. No parts of the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations. The tone is mostly neutral but viewpoints regarding the effects on viewers is underrepresented. The links to citations work, but some facts are not referenced to a reliable article. This is definitely an area of improvement. The sources come from a variety of authors and publications. Conversations on the talk page are mainly regarding changes to the article based on what qualifies as notable information and differences in opinion regarding what does. Wikipedia has a more broken up organization of content than the way topics have been presented to us in class and is also more encompassing but missing the details of specific circuits instead leading us to different articles or cited works. The article is of interest to four WikiProjects and claim to be of varying importance to all of them, ranging from mid to high levels of importance.