User:Primary resource/Aromatic compound/Cheerios1028 Peer Review

General info
Primary Resource
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Primary resource/Aromatic compound
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Aromatic compound

Lead

 * Good topic sentence that summarizes the article
 * Additions/rearrangements fit the original content well and add to it
 * General mention of the sections within the lead's content, but not explicitly stated. Flows well so maybe not needed unless required by Wikipedia
 * Concise, but detailed enough for proper understanding
 * One note: perhaps reword the "general properties" section to flow a little better (eg. remove pronouns for consistency)

Content

 * Content added supplements article well
 * Better coverage on the subject than previously had
 * For the reactions section, might be useful to add/re-add reaction schemes (if not already planning to) for clarity
 * Maybe explicitly add that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are also known as polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons as it can be confusing at first since the subtitle lists a different name than used in the paragraph

Tone and Balance

 * Good, neutral tone
 * Seemingly unbiased work
 * No persuasion

Sources and References

 * All claims/info that could require a potential source or reference have been cited with one
 * References are good, all seemingly reputable sources.

Organization

 * The reorganization of the original article's sections adds better clarity and flow
 * No apparent spelling or grammatical errors
 * Sentences that were rewritten are more clear than the original, or add more information/context

Images and Media

 * Image of furan is useful as it can be compared to the electron flow diagram for easier understanding. The diagram is also helpful even on its own and using the different colours works well for clarity
 * Unsure if an image of pyridine is useful as the picture lines up with the benzene ring model section, where pyridine is not mentioned (makes it a bit confusing). As well, two images/diagrams for the lead section is likely enough to supplement
 * The original image of hexabenzocoronene that was included in the PAH could be a helpful visual that might want to be added back in

Overall Impressions

 * Well organized and rewritten
 * New info either supplements original information or adds depth to article
 * Only thing is to be careful with the images, as some can be useful but too many can be overwhelming