User:Primary resource/Aromatic compound/Jeongbean Peer Review

The figures provided are concise and easily understood. For the reactions section, an enhancement can be made by numbering each reaction, or presenting an overall sequence prior to detailed explanations of each reaction.

Apart from these points, the work was flawless and well organized. I could notice the diligence and effort put forth by the team.

example) Aromatic substitution→ Coupling reactions → ....

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)