User:Princess Danso/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Digital photography

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate the digital photography article because I have an interest in taking photos and videos. I am also a YouTuber so I use my camera a lot and enjoy learning new things about my camera all the time. This article matters because It is important to get educated on the history of how photography first came to life. My first impression of the article was that it needed some work but it was still very informative.

Evaluate the article
The beginning of the article is well written because of how it introduces the topic of the article and gives background information of the topic. I like how the lead doesn't have an overload of facts or history of the topic. The article that I decided to evaluate has a lot of work that needs to be done in terms of content. This article can use some updating and it also may contain original research. Wikipedia mentions that articles should not have original research because there may be ideas or facts that are not from a reliable source. I don't believe that content needs to be taken out but I am not sure what the relevance is for adding oil photography. The topic of digital photography isn't a debatable topic so it was written from a neutral point of view. The content has not been updates since 2015 and this is another reason why I am interested in contributing to this article. The sources used In this article are correct and the article is clear to read. I believe that the article needs more pictures to enhance the understanding of the topic for readers. Overall, this article isn't bas but it needs some work. The biggest strength of this article is the background history, grammar and how digital photography affects social life. The article can be improved by more pictures and reliable information.