User:Princess ivy 2000/Social science/123abcd4567 Peer Review

General info
Princess ivy 2000
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Talk:Social science
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Social science

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

-Lead appears to be the same from the original/current version

-Lead is informative, but quite long

-Lead previews rest of article

Content:

-Content is relevant & up to date

-More could be added by peer

Tone & Balance:

-neutral tone

-information is balanced & neutral

Sources & References:

-Some links don't work (may be out of date)

-Some websites don't seem very reputable

-Does have strong, verifiable references

Organization:

-heavy sectioning makes it easy to understand/digest

-content is well-written

Overall impressions:

-more contributes (both content & references) could be added by peer