User:Pringlesandluffy/OXO-biodegradation/Jojo0577 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Pringlesandluffy


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Pringlesandluffy/OXO-biodegradation - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):OXO-biodegradation

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is easy to read and to understand there is no grammar corrections to be seen and the article is very organized with its subheadings.

For the context there are something's that could have been stitched around like the European Strategy for plastics. . . and the marine environment. could be both put near the end of the article and not in the beginning and the end since you just got done talking about the background. There are some things that could be caught up back to date for example some stuff was let updated back in 2017 when it has been 6 years since then. The dates could be organized better so you don't have one part of the article talking about 2017 the next part saying 2020 then the 3rd part saying 2017 again.

The tone has a lot of positivity and very serious very determined love that. what I think is very used lot is the same link that shows up for the same reason. wouldn't it just be beneficial if you did it once and not kept repeating the definition to the same work over and over again.

You have made some very great changes to your article! There are only a couple pieces of advice I can offer, one of them being that some of the terms you use (ex. oxidation, molecular weight, ASTM D6400) could benefit from the addition of in-text links to Wikipedia articles, this would contribute to more clarity in your article. Another thing, I think paragraphs 6 and 7 of the background section were a bit repetitive and could benefit from either being taken out or compacted into a shorter summary. I would also be careful about the ending of your "in the marine environment" section because it felt like you were getting a bit too close to having an un-neutral tone. My last bit of advice would be to watch your in-text citations in your standards applicability section, I didn't see any and while you had good information it's important to back that up with sources.