User:Priscaumba/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Mass media in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

The article has the potential to have more details and information about the media in the Republic of Congo.

At the moment it talks about some of the history which is good but information needs to be added about what is happening now.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is informative and gives details of the state of mass media in the Republic of Congo. It is not too detailed and gives information as of 2021.

The content is brief either stating some information but not too many details. There is Print information stated, but some are not updated to show what is currently available in the country. The information is very much neutral and does not seem biased in one way or the other.

The article is not poorly written, however, it could include more details in certain sections. In certain aspects, there are only brief sentences and not a lot of details included. There are some pages to sites that do not exist which is worrying about credibility.

There are not a lot of conversations happening on the talk page which means there is nothing actively happening to review and edit this particular page. The links on the page work and there are some good ones such as Freedom House. However, some of them are not verify which makes the article at the moment not credible.

My impression is that this is a start to the topic, however it can become more detailed and concise. The article is brief and leads to some good initial resources but it could be better.