User:Priyaraymond/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Discrimination)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this topic because I feel much of the world is still discriminated against. This topic I feel is important because it is still prevalent today. I know that times have changed but there is still ageism, disabilities, languagism and many more. I feel as a society, we will never evolve if we don't change these things. This article dives in deep on the different types of discrimination and gives examples from other countries on how they discriminate. I'm in awe of how this article talks about various of discrimination that even I wasn't aware about. I believe others will benefit from reading this article.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article talks about the etymology, age, caste, disability, language, nationality, race, region, religious beliefs, name, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, and reverse discrimination.

This article had a great lead section. The lead section made sure to include the definition of what discrimination is and included the topics that would be discussed throughout the article. The content is relevant to the article and it is up to date. The article does address topics that is historically relevant to the topic and population. This article is neutral. The article does not persuade. The article is backed up by secondary resources, sources are current, the authors are diverse and the links do work. Overall, the writing is clear, concise, easy to read, has no grammatical or spelling errors, and the article is well organized. The images are well captioned and provide further information for the topic.

This article is of high-importance and rated B-class. The strengths of this article include good secondary sources and provides various examples of discrimination that others may not know about. The article can be improved by talking about more topics such as xenophobia, how eating culture foods in schools you get criticized, the impact of discrimination for younger children, how wearing a hijab you get crazy looks. The article is well-developed.